send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In which of the following case, it was held that “a case where the conclusion of guilt rests solely on a retracted confession is opposed to law and cannot be allowed to stand”.
Arjuna Lal Mishra vs. State Cr LJ 1633 at 1635 (SC)
Balaji vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, 2010 Cri LJ 1934 (SC)
Rampal vs. State of Haryana, AIR, 2009 SC 2847
Both (b) and (c)
Arjuna lal mishra vs. state cr LJ 1633 at 1635 (SC)
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses