send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In which of the following given case, it was held that the ‘Rule of res gestae is an exception to rule of evidence, test is that the statement should be spontaneous and should form part of the same transaction ruling out any possibility of concoction’.
Sukhar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1999) 4Crime 191 SC
Javed Alam vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2009) 6 SCC 450
Kaside Rajendra vs. State, (2018) Cri LJ 877 (Hyd)
Ramdas vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2007 SC 155
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses