send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
(I) Assertion: It is true that the ban imposed by section 162 CrPC against the use of a statement of witness recorded by the police during the investigation is very sweeping.
(II) Reason: The restrictions given under section 162 CrPC cannot limit the power of the court under section 165 Evidence Act because Judge’s right is not to unfold the truth
only but his duty to intervene with his own questions.
Both (I) and (II) are correct but (II) is not the true explanation of (I).
Both (I) and (II) are correct but (II) is the correct explanation of (I).
The restrictions given under section162 CrPC limits the power of the court given under 165 Evidence Act
(I) is wrong but (II) is right
Section 165 of the Act, a court is authorised to make use of statements made by witnesses during the course of investigation. [Raghunandan vs. State of U.P, AIR 1974 SC 463]
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses