In which of the following case it was held that ldquo the identification parade of the accused ...........

Indian Evidence Act (IEA) 1872 Judgment of Court

In which of the following case, it was held that “the identification parade of the accused before the court is not the main substantive piece of evidence rather it is corroborative in

nature”.

Manoj Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2019) 5 SCC 663

Navaneetha krishnan vs. State by Inspector of Police (2018) 16 SCC 161

Kamlakar vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) SC

State of Tamil Nadu vs. Suresh Ranjan (2014) 11 SCC 709

Explanation:

Two Judge bench – Hon’ble R.K. Agrawal and A.K. Sikri JJ. Author – Hon’ble R.K. Agrawal, J Date – 16 April, 2018

By: santosh

Profile ResourcesReport error

Submit Error

Let's Discuss

Post Comment

Explore
Micro
Courses

Free
Video
Courses

Free
Test
Series

Free
PDF
Documents

Back to Main Page

In which of the following case it was held that ldquo the identification parade of the accused ...........

Explanation:

Let's Discuss

Search below