send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
“A person of the position, grit and intelligence of accused could not be so coerced. A person making a confession may be guided by any considerations which, according to him, would benefit him. Accused must have made the statement after weighting the consequences which he thought would be beneficial to him” was held in –
R.K. Dalmia vs. Delhi Administration AIR 1962 SC 1821.
Pangambam Kalanjoy Singh vs. State of Manipur AIR 1956 SC 9
Balbir Singh vs. State of Punjab AIR 1957 SC 216.
Chandrakant Chaimanlal Desai vs. State of Gujarat (1992) 1 SCC 473.
R.K. Dalmia vs. Delhi Administration, AIR 1962 (SC) 1821
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses