send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
By what act, clause (4) to section 155 of the Evidence Act i.e. ‘when a man is prosecuted for rape or an attempt to ravish, it may be shown that the prosecutrix was of generally immoral character’ was omitted?
Act 4 of 2003
Act 2 of 2006
Act 13 of 2013
Act 21 of 2000
- Section 155(4) of the Indian Evidence Act allowed for showing that the prosecutrix in a rape case was of generally immoral character.
- This clause was controversial and criticized for victim-blaming.
- The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Act 4 of 2003 - omitted this clause, aiming to offer better protection and dignity to victims of sexual offences.
- Act 2 of 2006, Act 13 of 2013, and Act 21 of 2000 are other amendments to various laws, but not relevant to this specific omission.
- This change was a big step towards improving the legal process for survivors of sexual violence.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses