Select the correct statements –

(i) Section 6 of the Evidence Act, is an exception to the general rule where under the hearsay evidence becomes admissible. But for brining such hearsay evidence within

the provisions of section 6, what is not required to be established is that it must be almost contemporaneous with the acts.

(ii) There should not be an interval which would allow fabrication.

(iii) The statements sought to be admitted, therefore, as forming part of res gestae, must have been made contemporaneously with the acts or immediately thereafter. 

(iv) Rule of res gestae is exception to rule of evidence, test is that the statement should be spontaneous and should form part of the same transaction ruling out any possibility of

concoction.

(v) The question is, whether certain goods ordered from ‘B’ were delivered to ‘A’. The goods were delivered to several intermediate persons successively. Each deliver is

irrelevant fact.

(vi) ‘A’ sues ‘B’ for a libel contained in a letter forming part of a correspondence. Letters between the parties relating to the subject out of which the libel arose, and forming part

of the correspondence in which it is contained, are relevant facts, provided they do contain the libel itself.