send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
When there is a question whether an act was accidental or intentional, [or done with a particular knowledge or intention,] the fact that such act formed part of a series of similar
occurrences, in each of which the person doing the act was concerned, is relevant. The words “or done with a particular knowledge or intention” was not originally given in the section rather was inserted by the -
Act 1 of 1890
Act 2 of 1891
Act 3 of 1891
Act 4 of 1890
- The question discusses when an act's nature (accidental or intentional) is deliberated.
- Originally, one section did not contain the words “or done with a particular knowledge or intention.”
- These words were later added to the section by a specific act.
- You are provided with four options regarding which act introduced these words:
- Option 1: Act 1 of 1890
- Option 2: Act 2 of 1891
- Option 3: Act 3 of 1891
- Option 4: Act 4 of 1890
- The correct answer is Option 3: Act 3 of 1891.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses