send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Find out the correct statements:-
(i) Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 declares that motive, inter alia, is a relevant fact for which evidence may be adduced. Motive is that state of mind which compels one person to do a particular act. For every voluntarily act, there is usually an impelling motive behind.
(ii) Since Motive is physical fact, it can be fathomed by the conduct of the person. The facts of previous threats, altercation, litigation etc. manifest motive.
(iii) Proof of motive only adds weight and value to evidence of prosecution.
(iv) If motive is proved, it will be a contradictive piece of evidence. But if the prosecution is not able to prove motive, it will not be a ground to throw away the prosecution case
or corrode its credibility.
(v) As per explanation 1 to section 8 of the Evidence Act, the conduct of a party interested in any proceeding at the time when the facts occurred out of which the proceedings arises is extremely relevant. Therefore, the word ‘conduct’ includes statements even if does not accompany and explain the acts.
(vi) Motive is not a necessary element in deciding culpability but is an equally important missing link which can be used to corroborate the evidence.
(i), (ii), (iii), (v), (vi)
(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi)
(i), (ii), (iii), (vi)
(i), (iii), (vi)
Motive is a psychological fact; it can be fathomed by the conduct of the person. If motive is proved, it will be a corroborative piece of evidence. But if the prosecution is not able to prove motive, it will not be a ground to throw away the prosecution case or corrode its credibility. [Vijay Shankar vs. State of Haryana 04.08.2015]. Explanation 1 to Section 8- The word conduct does not include statements, unless those statements accompany and explain acts than statements; and it is on such a statement that the significance of the act, which it accompanies, in many cases, wholly depends.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses