send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Select the correct statements –
(i) The object of section 145 of the Evidence Act is either to test the memory of a witness or to contradict him by previous statement in writing.
(ii) Such writing may be documents, letters, depositions, police diaries, etc.
(iii) The previous record should be in writing.
(iv) The witness may not be contradicted by his previous verbal statements.
(v) The witness may also be contradicted by his previous verbal statements.
(vi) The expression ‘previous statements made’ used in section 145 of the Evidence Act, cannot be extended to include statements made by a witness, after the filing of the
charge-sheet. The expression must, therefore, be confined to statements made by a witness before the police during investigation and not thereafter.
(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (vi)
(i), (ii), (iii), (iv)
(i), (ii), (iii), (v)
(i), (ii), (iii), (v), (vi)
The witness may also be contradicted by his previous verbal statement – Section 153, Exception-2.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses