Find out the correct answer ndash ........

Indian Evidence Act (IEA) 1872 Relevancy of Facts

Find out the correct answer –

A previous judgment passed on a compromise is a judgment in rem within the meaning of section 41 of the Evidence Act and therefore bar to a subsequent suit.

A previous judgment passed on a compromise is not a judgment in rem within the meaning of section 41 of the Evidence Act and therefore no bar to a subsequent suit.

A previous judgment passed on a compromise is not a judgment in rem within the meaning of section 41 of the Evidence Act but bar to a subsequent suit.

A previous judgment passed on a compromise is a judgment in rem within the meaning of section 41 of the Evidence Act but not bar to a subsequent suit.

Explanation:

Not a judgment in rem within the meaning of this section and is therefore, no bar to a subsequent suit. [Rahmat Ali Khan (Pir) vs. Musammat Babu Zuhra (1911) PR No. 14 of 1912 (Civil)].