send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A, the landowner, filed a suit for ejectment against B, a tenant. B alleged that he was a permanent tenant at a fixed rent under an agreement with the original owner of the land,
which was dead, and put in evidence, the statements made by the original owner after he had transferred his interest.
The statements are admissible.
The statements are inadmissible.
The statements are conclusive in nature.
The statements create an estoppel.
The statements are inadmissible because under section 18 of the Evidence Act, statements (either by parties interested or form whom parties to the suit derived their interest) are admissions only if they are made during the continuance of the interest of the persons making the statement.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses