send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
When an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC is dismissed, the defendant has a remedy to file an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC against the above dismissal order. However, once such an appeal is dismissed, the same contention —
Can be raised in a first appeal under Section 96 (2) CPC
Cannot be raised in a first appeal under Section 96 (2) CPC
May or may not be raised in a first appeal under Section 96 (2) CPC because it depends upon the discretion of the defendant only whether to raise the same or not.
Once the defendant has already sought the remedy under Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC, again the question of filing an appeal under Section 96 (2) CPC does not arise.
[M/S. Neerja Relators Pvt. Ltd. vs. Janglu (dead) Through LRs. (29 Jan, 2018) CJI Dipak Misra, AM khanwilkar, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ]
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses