send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The word ‘might’ given under Explanation IV to Section 11 CPC, pre-supposes the party affected had knowledge of the ground of attack or defence at the time of the previous suit. Whereas, ‘ought’ compels the party to take such ground. The word between the above two terms must be read as –
Conjunctive (and)
Disjunctive (or)
Conjunctive (and) only and not Disjunctive
Disjunctive (or) only and not Conjunctive
The word ‘and’ is given between the terms ‘might’ and ‘ought’ under explanation IV to Section 11 CPC, [It must be read as conjunctive (and) not disjunctive (or) C.K.Takwani – chapter 2, Page 85].
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses