send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Select the correct statements –
(i) Temporary injunction granted by the court pendente lite comes to an end when the suit is finally decided.
(ii) If the suit is dismissed, temporary injunction is vacated. But if the suit is decreed, temporary injunction comes to an end.
(iii) If the suit is dismissed, the temporary injunction comes to an end but if suit is decreed, the temporary injunction is vacated.
(iv) If the suit is for permanent injunction, temporary injunction granted by the court is made perpetual or permanent as part of decree passed by the Court.
(v) If the suit is for permanent injunction, temporary injunction granted by the Court is not made perpetual or permanent as a part of decree passed by the court.
(vi) Mandatory injunction at an interlocutory stage can be granted in rarest of rare cases.
(vii) An order granting or refusing to grant injunction is subject to appeal.
(viii) Where ex-parte relief is granted by the court and the application is not decided within thirty days, the aggrieved may prefer an appeal against such an order.
(ix) An order granting or refusing an injunction is ‘not a case decided’ within Section 115 of the code and therefore, no revision lies against-such an order.
(x) In case where no appeal or revision lies against an order grating or refusing temporary injunction, a writ petition under Article 226 or 277 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable.
(i), (ii), (v), (vi), (ix), (x)
(i), (iii), (iv), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix)
(iii), (iv), (vi), (viii), (ix), (x)
(i), (ii), (iv), (vi), (vii), (viii)
[An order granting or refusing an injunction is ‘a case decided’ within the meaning of section 115 of the code and hence, a revision lies against such an order – Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd. (1998) I SCC 720]. [A writ petition is always maintainable under Article 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India in case where no appeal or revision lies against an order grating or refusing temporary injunction].
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses