send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
‘A’ files a suit against B, C and D on a mortgage bond and gets an ex-parte decree against all of them. B alone applies to set it aside. Neither in the mortgage bond nor in the plaint nor in the decree there is any specification of shares and liabilities of the respective defendants. Therefore, the decree -
The decree must be set-aside against B alone
The decree must be set-aside as a whole.
It is upon the discretion of the Court either to set it aside against B alone or against all as a whole.
The decree must be set-aside B alone because B only applies to set it aside.
The decree must be set aside as a whole and not only against B alone. [Where the relief to which the applicant is entitled cannot effectively be given otherwise than by setting aside the decree against the other defendant also].
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses