send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
‘L’ sues ‘T’ for rent for the year 2015-16 alleging that ‘T’ was liable to pay it. ‘T’ applied for time to file the written statement, which was refused. The suit was decreed and the only issue raised by the court was regarding the amount of rent. Thereafter, ‘L’ files another suit against ‘T’ for the rent for the year 2017-18. ‘T’ contended that suit is barred by Res-Judicata. Find out the correct answer -
The matter was directly and substantially in issue in the previous suit.
The matter was not directly and substantially in issue in the previous suit.
The matter was directly and substantially in issue and, therefore, defence is barred by res-judicata.
The matter was not directly and substantially in issue and, therefore, defence is not barred by res-judicata.
The question about T's liability was not alleged and decided in the previous suit and therefore, matter was not directly and substantially in issue in the previous suit. The defence was not barred by R.J.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses