send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In which of the following case, it was said by the Hon’ble Supreme Court with regards to Section 92 CPC that “as regards to any charitable or religious institution, any devotee could move the jurisdictional District Judge throughout India with any grievance and the court could give appropriate directions for sound management and if need be send a report to the High Court which will consider issues of Public Interest with reference to these institutions and supplement or supplant the directions as may become necessary”.
Mrinalini Padhi vs. UOI 2018 SCC online 667
Krishnaveni Nagam vs. Harish Nagam AIR 2017 SC 1345
Swapnil Tripathi vs. Supreme Court of India (2018) 10 SCC 639
Salem Advocate Bar association, Tamil Nadu vs. UOI 2005 SC
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses