send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The accused purchased a watch for Rs.100 from a house. The accused is guilty of
Theft.
Criminal breach of trust.
Criminal misappropriations of property.
No offence.
Let’s break it down:
- Theft? Not really. Theft means taking someone’s property dishonestly without their consent. If the accused bought the watch and paid Rs.100, there was consent. That rules out theft.
- Criminal breach of trust? Nope. That would mean the accused was entrusted with property and then misused it. Here, there’s no trust betrayed—it’s just a sale.
- Criminal misappropriation? That’s about taking possession in a dishonest way, without any intention to return the property or pay for it. Again, the accused paid money, there’s no evidence of dishonesty.
- No offence This is a basic sale. Payment was made, so the transaction itself isn’t illegal—unless you have extra facts (like if the seller wasn’t the real owner), but nothing like that is mentioned here.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses