send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Dalit indiscriminately fired at their purruers. They are _______
Guilty of murder.
Not guilty of murder as they did not enter to cause death.
Guilty of grievous hurt.
None of the above.
- Option 1: Guilty of murder.
- If Dalit fired indiscriminately and caused death, they might be guilty of murder. Intent can be inferred from indiscriminate firing when death occurs.
- Correct Answer
- Option 2: Not guilty of murder as they did not enter to cause death.
- This suggests Dalit didn't have the intention or premeditation to kill. However, a lack of intent to kill doesn't absolve responsibility if death occurs from their actions.
- Option 3: Guilty of grievous hurt.
- This applies if the actions caused serious injury but did not result in death. Indiscriminate firing causing death goes beyond grievous hurt.
- Option 4: None of the above.
- This implies none of the options apply, which seems unlikely if a death occurred due to their actions.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses