Explanation:

- Option 1: The fight should not have been prearranged.

- This means that for a scenario to be considered under exception IV to section 300, a fight shouldn't be planned in advance. This implies spontaneity in the act.

- Option 2: The word fight used in exception IV to sec. 300 is something more than a verbal quarrel.

- Here, "fight" indicates physical confrontation. It should be more than just exchanging harsh words or having a verbal argument.

- Option 3: Both of the above.

- This option suggests that both statements are necessary for interpreting exception IV to sec. 300 correctly.

- Option 4: None of the above.

- This implies neither of the first two options is applicable.

Option 3: Both of the above. This option correctly combines the stipulations for understanding exception IV to sec. 300.