send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Give the correct response
A knowledge that the natural and problem consequence of an act would be death.
An intention to kill is not always necessary to make out a case of murder
Both (a) an (b).
None of the above.
- Option 1: A person can be held accountable for murder if they understand their actions have a natural consequence that would likely result in death.
- Option 2: Murder charges do not always require explicit intent to kill; recklessness or knowledge of the potential outcome can suffice.
- Option 3: Combines the statements from Option 1 and Option 2, suggesting both are necessary aspects for considering an act as murder.
- Option 4: Claims none of the statements are applicable or relevant to make out a case of murder.
- Correct Answer: Option 3 - Both (a) and (b).
.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses