Give correct response ........

Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 Abetment

Give correct response

If one instigates another to perpetuate particular crime & that other in pursuance of instigation not only perpetrate that crime but in the course of doing so commits another crime. Abettor is liable for another crime.

Sec. 111 IPC proceeds on the maxim Every man is presumed to intend the natural consequence of his act.

Both (a) and (b).

None of the above.

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Abetment

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

- Option 1: This states that if someone instigates a person to commit a crime, and the person ends up committing not only that crime but also another crime in the process, the instigator (abettor) is liable for the additional crime. This is in line with Indian legal principles as an abettor can be held responsible for the outcomes of their instigation.

- Option 2: Refers to Section 111 of the Indian Penal Code, indicating the principle that a person is assumed to intend the natural results of their actions. This relates to the concept of legal accountability for foreseeable consequences of one's actions.

- Option 3: Both Option 1 and Option 2 are correct in reflecting legal principles regarding abetment and consequential liability under Indian law.

- Option 4: States none of the above are correct, which is not true in this context.

Correct Answer: Option 3 - Both (a) and (b).