send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
An argument that the components of the criminal justice system are in conflict, and that there is actually no system at all.
Juvenile Justice
Fairness
United States Supreme Court
Non-system Argument
- Juvenile Justice: This focuses on how young offenders are handled by the justice system. It highlights policy variation compared to the adult system, sometimes causing inconsistency.
- Fairness: This revolves around equitable treatment within the justice processes. It reviews whether practices are impartial or biased.
- United States Supreme Court: It is the highest court, which oversees constitutional law and ensures proper justice administration. Its focus might sometimes clash with lower courts.
- Non-system Argument: This argues that the criminal justice components (police, courts, corrections) have competing goals, leading to clashes and inefficiency.
Non-system Argument highlights inter-agency conflicts and disorganization, suggesting there's no unified system.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses