send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Burden of proving that case of accused comes within exception lies on….
Prosecution
Accused
Magistrate
Any one
- Option 1: Prosecution
- The prosecution must prove the main elements of the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
- But the exceptions (general or special) are often for the benefit of the accused.
- Option 2: Accused
- When an accused claims his case comes under a legal exception (like self-defense or insanity), it's his responsibility to prove it.
- He needs to prove this on the balance of probabilities, not beyond reasonable doubt.
- This is mentioned in Section 105 of the Indian Evidence Act.
- Option 3: Magistrate
- The Magistrate does not have the burden to prove exception; he only decides based on evidence.
- Option 4: Any one
- The burden does not freely shift to anyone; the law assigns it clearly, usually to the accused for exceptions.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses