send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Reading the amended s. 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the insertions of O. 10, which of the following conditions should be satisfied before matter could be referred to an Alternate Dispute Redressal?
I. Existence of elements of settlement in the opinion of the Court
II. The parties must share the opinion of the court
III. Formulation of the terms of settlement by the court
IV. The court should invite the observation of the parties on the terms of settlement
V. Observations of the parties must be received by the court
VI. If need be, reformulate the terms of settlement and refer the same for Alternate Dispute Redressal contemplated un s. 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure
II, III
I, IV
I, V, VI
All of these
Here is a breakdown of the conditions:
- I. Existence of elements of settlement in the opinion of the Court: The court must first identify if there are elements suitable for settlement.
- II. The parties must share the opinion of the court: It is not necessary for parties to agree with the court's opinion initially.
- III. Formulation of the terms of settlement by the court: The court should attempt to draft possible terms for a settlement.
- IV. The court should invite the observation of the parties on the terms of settlement: It must seek the parties' views on the proposed terms.
- V. Observations of the parties must be received by the court: The court should consider the parties' feedback.
- VI. If need be, reformulate the terms of settlement and refer the same for Alternate Dispute Redressal: The court might need to adjust terms before referring to ADR.
Analyzing these points:
- Option 1 lacks the necessity for parties to provide observations and reformulated terms.
- Option 2 omits key steps involving re-evaluation and modification.
- Option 3 is missing formulation and initial party opinion sharing.
- Option 4 encompasses all necessary steps mentioned and correctly outlines the procedure.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses