send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A sues B for rent due for the year 1902. The defence is that the land is rent-free. An issue is raised, ‘whether the land is rent-free’. The court finds that the land is rent-free, and A’s suit is dismissed. Subsequently, A sues B claiming rent for the year 1904. B again sets up the same defence, namely, that the land is rent-free.
Here, the question of A’s right to recover the rent having not been ‘directly and substantially’ in issue in the previous suit, a suit for the rent for 1904 is barred as res judicata
Here, the question of A’s right to recover the rent having been ‘directly and substantially’ in issue in the previous suit, a suit for the rent for 1904 cannot be barred as res judicata
Here, the question of A’s right to recover the rent having been ‘directly and substantially’ in issue in the previous suit, a suit for the rent for 1904 is barred as res judicata
None of these
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses