On the basis of the different judgments, it is settled that which of the following principles should be kept in mind in dealing with the applications for amendment for the pleading?

I. All amendments should be allowed which is necessary for determination of the real controversies in the suit

II. The proposed amendment should not alter and be a substitute of the cause of action on the basis of which the original list was raised

III. Inconsistent and contradictory allegations in negation to the admitted position of facts or mutually destructive allegations of facts would not be allowed to be incorporated by means of amendments

IV. Proposed amendments should not cause prejudice to the other side which cannot be compensated by means of costs

V. Amendment of a claim or relief barred by time should not be allowed

VI. No amendment should be allowed which amounts to or results in defeating a legal right to the opposite party on account of lapse of time

VII. No party should suffer on account of the tech¬nicalities of the law and the amendment should be allowed to minimise the litigation between the parties

VIII. The delay in filling the petitions for amendment of the pleadings should be properly compensated by costs

IX. Error or mistake, which is not fraudulent, should not be made to the ground for rejecting the application for amendments of pleadings