send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A sues B, a manager appointed by the court in an administration suit, for a declaration, that he had validly surrendered his lease. B’s defence is that the suit was not maintainable for want of notice under s. 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that the surrender was not valid. The court of first instance decided both the issues against A. B then sued A for royalty due under that lease.
The finding in the former suit that the lease was not validity surrendered was maintainable in spite of notice under s. 80
The finding in the former suit that the lease was a validity surrendered but not maintainable for want of notice under s. 80
The finding in the former suit that the lease was not validity surrendered was not maintainable for want of notice under s. 80
None of these
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses