send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
If a defendant is sued for slander, the only way to meet the plaintiff’s claim is to plead:
That the words in questions were not spoken and published
That they were spoken and published are true
That they were spoken and published and are privileged
All of these
- Option 1: Argue that the alleged slanderous words were not spoken or published. This is the most direct denial of the plaintiff’s claim.
- Option 2: If the words were spoken and published, assert that they are true. Truth is a common defense in slander cases; if the statement is true, it is not slanderous.
- Option 3: Claim that the words were spoken and published under a privileged circumstance. Privileged communications like those in court statements are typically immune from slander claims.
- Option 4: All of these are potential defenses in a slander case, each providing a valid legal strategy.
Your answer is Option 4: All of these.
“”
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses