send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following does not deals with final determination of contested questions and have the binding effect in future litigation
Res subjudice
Res Judicata
Stare decisis
Both (a) and (b)
- Res sub judice: Refers to a matter that is currently under trial or consideration by a court. It doesn't deal with the final determination or have any binding effect on future litigation.
- Res Judicata: A legal principle where a matter that has been finally decided by a competent court cannot be litigated again by the same parties. It has a binding effect on future litigation.
- Stare decisis: The doctrine of precedent, where past judicial decisions are authoritative in cases with similar facts. It ensures consistency and predictability in the law.
- Both (a) and (b): This option suggests both Res sub judice and Res Judicata have similar effects, which is incorrect as explained above.
Therefore, option 1: Res sub judice does not deal with the final determination of contested questions nor does it have binding effects in future litigation.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses