send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
An arrested person has a right to consult a legal practitioner of his choice. The consultation with the lawyer:
may not be in the presence of the police officer
may be in the presence of the police officer but not within his hearing
may be in the presence of the police officer and within his hearing
both (a) & (b).
- Individuals who are arrested have the right to speak with a lawyer of their choice.
- This legal consultation should ideally ensure privacy, fundamental to confidential legal advice.
- Option 1: The consultation may not be in the presence of a police officer, providing complete privacy.
- Option 2: Consultation may be in the presence of a police officer but without them hearing the conversation, maintaining privacy in practice.
- Option 3: Consultation may be in the presence of a police officer and within hearing, which could infringe on confidentiality.
- Option 4: Combines aspects of Option 1 and Option 2, but prioritizing non-hearing presence (Option 2) aligns with privacy rights.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses