send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A husband was directed to pay maintenance to his wife and his minor son under section 125 of the CrPC. Subsequently the matter was settled outside Court on a lump-sum payment made by husband to the wife. Approximately after nine years of the agreement, the wife moved an application for the enforcement of the maintenance order. Which of the following statements will apply to the case?
The long delay of nine years will cause the application to be rejected
Mutual settlement outside the Court has rendered the order as void, as such the application will be rejected
The wife has wavered her right to maintenance and as such the application will be rejected
The waiver in derogation of a statutory right cannot be recognised by the Court, as such the application will be accepted
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses