send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Section 13 (1) and Section 18 (1) were held violative of which of the following article of the Constitution by the Madras High Court as they authorise the conferment of powers?
Article 12
Article 13
Article 14
Article 15
- Section 13 (1) and Section 18 (1): These sections were struck down by the Madras High Court for being unconstitutional as they permit unchecked delegation of powers, which can lead to arbitrary decisions.
- Article 12: Defines the "State" for the purpose of Parts III and IV of the Constitution, which pertains to Fundamental Rights. It is not directly related to this case.
- Article 13: Declares laws that contravene Fundamental Rights as void. It is relevant but not the central issue here.
- Article 14: Guarantees the right to equality before the law and equal protection of the laws. The focus of the case is on arbitrary power, which violates this article.
- Article 15: Prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It is not relevant to this case.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses