send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The court is said to have taken cognizance when it:
orders investigation under section 156(3) of Cr PC
issues a search warrant for the purpose of investigation
both (a) and (b)
neither (a) nor (b).
- Option 1: Orders investigation under section 156(3) of Cr PC: Under this section, a magistrate can order police to investigate. This action does not amount to the court taking cognizance as it's a preliminary step.
- Option 2: Issues a search warrant for the purpose of investigation: A search warrant assists in investigation but does not mean the court has taken cognizance of the case.
- Option 3: Both (a) and (b): As explained, neither actions represent the court taking cognizance.
- Option 4: Neither (a) nor (b): Correct. Both actions are investigative, not indicative of cognizance.
Correct Answer: Option 4 - Neither (a) nor (b).
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses