send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Give the correct response
A knowledge that the natural and problem consequence of an act would be death.
An intention to kill is not always necessary to make out a case of murder
Both (a) an (b).
None of the above.
- Option 1: Acknowledges that knowing an act will naturally result in death can imply malice aforethought, which is foundational for classifying the act as murder.
- Option 2: States that intent to kill isn't always necessary for murder; causing death while intending serious harm can suffice, recognizing degrees of intent in legal frameworks.
- Option 3: Combines understanding outcomes and intent's degrees; both options highlight elements crucial for murder under legal definitions.
- Option 4: Implies neither knowledge of consequences nor varied intent is relevant, which is generally inaccurate legally.
Option 3: Both (a) an (b).
“”
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses