send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Give the correct response
It is only the use of force which distinguish rioting from on unlawful assembly.
A riot is an unlawful assembly in a particular state of activity.
Both (a) and (b).
None of the above.
- Option 1: It suggests that the defining feature between rioting and an unlawful assembly is the use of force. While use of force is a factor, the legal definitions can be broader.
- Option 2: This states that a riot is a specific kind of unlawful assembly where there is active disruption. This captures both the gathering and the actions taken by the group.
- Option 3: Both options together mean a riot is an unlawful assembly with the added element of force or activity.
- Option 4: Claims neither statement is correct.
The best answer is Option 3, as it combines both elements needed for accurate definition.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses