send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Give the correct response :
An offence can be abetted though the means which are intended to be employed are such which could not bring the desirous effect.
It is not necessary for abetment that the person abetted should have the guilty intention or knowledge as that of abettor.
Both (a) and (b).
None of the above.
- Option 1: An offence can indeed be abetted even if the methods used are not capable of producing the intended effect. What matters is the intention to abet.
- Option 2: It is true that for abetment, the person being abetted doesn't need to share the same guilty intention or knowledge as the abettor. The focus is on the abettor's intention.
- Option 3: Both statements are accurate and reflect the legal concepts of abetment correctly.
- Option 4: This option is incorrect as both (a) and (b) are valid statements.
Option 3: Both (a) and (b).
""
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses