send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Atif is charged with the murder of KhudaBaksh on the 21st January, 1882. In fact, the murdered person’s name was HaidarBaksh, and the date of the murder was the 20th January, 1882. Atif was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which referred exclusively to the case of HaidarBaksh. What will the Court infer from this while applying Section 215 Cr. PC.?
the Court may infer from these facts that Atif was not misled and that the error in the charge was immaterial
the Court may infer from these facts that Atif was misled and that the error in the charge was immaterial
the Court may infer from these facts that Atif was misled and that the error in the charge was material
none of them
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses