send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Give the correct response
It is necessary only in the case person abetting an offence but intentionally aiding another to commit that offence.
It is not necessary for the offence of abetment that the act abetted must be committed.
Both (a) and (b)
None of the above.
- Option 1: It states that it is necessary only for someone who abets an offence to intend for someone else to commit it. This highlights the need for intentional aiding in abetment but this is specific to aiding rather than the commission of an offence.
- Option 2: This means that abetment is possible even if the crime isn't completed. The focus is on the encouragement or aid towards the attempt.
- Option 3: Both Option 1 and Option 2 can be true as they discuss different aspects of abetment.
- Option 4: Suggests none of the above options are correct.
Answer: Option 3: Both (a) and (b), they both describe conditions possible in the context of abetment. Your answer is correct and...
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses