send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Point out incorrect response. The principle underlying section 91 I.P.C. is that consent will only condone the act causing harm to the person giving the consent, which will otherwise be an offence. Acts which are offences independently of any harm which they may cause will not be covered by consent given by the sufferer. Some instances of such acts are :
Offences against public safety.
Causing miscarriage to a woman.
Mischief.
Public nuisance.
- Section 91 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC): Consent is valid for actions causing harm to the consenting person, otherwise deemed an offence. However, offences that are independently criminal irrespective of harm or consent, aren't excused by consent.
- Option 1: Offences against public safety
- These are crimes regardless of personal consent, as they endanger society.
- Example: Carrying a firearm in public without a license can't be consented to lawfully.
- Option 2: Causing miscarriage to a woman
- It's illegal and considered an offence against the unborn child, irrespective of the woman's consent, except in some medical circumstances.
- Option 3: Mischief
- This offence involves causing damage or harm to property and isn't independently criminal without harm or consent implications.
- This option isn't fitting the principle of Section 91.
- Option 4: Public nuisance
- This affects the community's rights at large and can't be consented to by an individual.
- Correct Answer: Option 3
- This option does not exemplify acts independently criminal without consent consideration.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses