send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Give the correct response : An intoxicated person is exonerated from liability of his acts provided
That the thing which intoxicated him was administered to him without his knowledge or against his will.
That at the time of doing it he was in such state of intoxication that he was unable to know the nature of his acts.
Both (a) and (b).
None of the above.
- Option 1: If intoxication is without the person's knowledge or against their will, they might be exonerated. They didn't choose to become impaired, so they're less accountable.
- Option 2: An intoxicated person who can't discern their actions is potentially not liable. They didn't possess the ability to understand their actions due to the intoxication.
- Option 3: This combines both conditions. If both apply, the person is generally exonerated.
- Option 4: None of the above implies no exoneration, even if intoxication wasn't voluntary or severe.
- Correct Answer: Option 3 - Both (a) and (b).
.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses