send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which is not an ingredient in means rea:
Strict or absolute liability
Public nuisance
Ignorance of law is no excuse – maxim
All are correct.
- Option 1: Strict or absolute liability
- This is a legal concept where liability is imposed regardless of fault or mens rea.
- Mens rea (Latin for "guilty mind") is not required to prove strict liability offenses.
- Option 2: Public nuisance
- This is a type of crime that affects the community or public at large.
- Mens rea is usually not a major factor in proving public nuisance cases.
- Option 3: Ignorance of law is no excuse – maxim
- This is a legal principle stating that lack of knowledge of the law does not absolve one from liability.
- This principle does not relate to the concept of mens rea.
- Option 4: All are correct
- All listed options do not have mens rea as an ingredient.
- Correct Answer: Option 4
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses