send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Give the correct response :
Mere use of abusive language does not give rise to Private defence.
Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of right of Private Defence.
Both (a) and (b).
None of the above.
- Option 1: Mere use of abusive language does not establish a right to private defense. Private defense is usually justified when there is an immediate threat to life or safety, not just verbal abuse.
- Option 2: Actions taken under the right of private defense are not considered offenses as long as the conditions for exercising such a right are met, such as an imminent threat.
- Option 3: Both statements (a) and (b) are true and relevant to the laws surrounding private defense.
- Option 4: None of the above would mean that neither statement is correct, which isn’t true as both statements (a) and (b) accurately reflect legal principles regarding private defense.
Correct Answer: Option 3 - Both (a) and (b).
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses