Explanation:

Let's break down the matchings:

Statements and Sections:

- de minimis non curat lex = The law does not concern itself with trifles. (IPC Sec. 95)

- Volenti non fit injuria = To one who volunteers, no harm is done (consent as a defence). (IPC Sec. 87)

- delirium tremens = A mental condition due to alcohol withdrawal, legally relevant for insanity. (IPC Sec. 84 or 90 usually, but more specifically refers to incapacity to consent - Sec. 90)

Options decodings:

- A. Sec. 872 (Possibly typo; IPC runs only till 511, but IPC Sec. 87 matches Volenti non fit injuria)

- B. Sec. 863 (Typo; doesn't exist)

- C. Sec. 90 (Consent given under fear or misconception is not valid - relevant for 'delirium tremens' in incapacity)

- D. Sec. 95 (de minimis non curat lex)

Now, the options:

- Option 1: 1 D, 2 A, 3 C

- Option 2: 2 C, 3 B, 1 D

- Option 3: A B D

- Option 4: D A B

Correct Matching:

1. de minimis non curat lex ? D (Sec. 95)

2. Volenti non fit injuria ? A (Sec. 87)

3. delirium tremens ? C (Sec. 90)

Therefore, Option 1: 1 D, 2 A, 3 C is correct.

---

?? Correct answer:

Option 1: 1 D, 2 A, 3 C

Explanation:

- de minimis non curat lex matches with IPC 95 (trivial acts not an offense).

- Volenti non fit injuria is codified by IPC 87 (consent as a defence).

- Delirium tremens relates to incapacity to consent, covered by IPC 90.