send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Give the correct response
A headmaster who administers in good faith reasonable corporeal punishment to the children is entitled to the benefit of Sec. 88.
A surgeon who performs major operation with consent of patient is entitled to the benefit of Sec. 88.
Both (a) and (b).
None of the above.
- Option 1: A headmaster administering reasonable corporeal punishment in good faith could be entitled to the benefit of Sec. 88 if the punishment is considered within the boundaries of correct disciplinary action for the betterment of the child.
- Option 2: A surgeon performing a major operation with the patient's consent is clearly within the domain of Sec. 88, as the action is intended for the patient's benefit and is carried out with explicit consent.
- Option 3: Both options 1 and 2 fall under actions covered by Sec. 88, assuming all conditions are met such as good faith, consent, and benefit.
- Option 4: Incorrect, as both options 1 and 2 can be appropriate in the context given.
Correct Answer: Option 3 - Both (a) and (b).
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses