send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Section 34 of I.P.C. provides for liability based on common intention. Consider the following situations:
1. The weapon used in the offence was found in A’s house.
2. A has procured the weapon of offence voluntarily to aid the criminal gang.
3. A was compelled under threat to his life to procure the weapon of offence.
4. The weapon was supplied on receipt of value of the weapon (sale). Which of the situation given above reflect (s) the correct ingredients with regard of Section 34?
1 and 2
2 and 3
2 only
4 only.
- Statement 1: If the weapon used in the offense was simply found in A's house, it doesn’t necessarily indicate A’s common intention to commit the crime alongside others. Passive possession doesn’t imply shared intent.
- Statement 2: A voluntarily procuring the weapon for the criminal gang suggests an active role and shared intention, aligning with Section 34 for common intention liability.
- Statement 3: If A was compelled under threat to procure the weapon, the element of voluntary shared intention is missing, thus it doesn’t satisfy Section 34. Coercion negates shared intent.
- Statement 4: Merely selling a weapon without a shared criminal intention doesn’t establish common intention under Section 34. Transactional sale doesn’t imply shared intent.
Option: 2, 2 only aligns with the correct interpretation of Section 34, as it reflects voluntary and shared intention.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses