send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The possession or ownership of property of the grand father of defendant on the basis of documents 30 years old can
be proved
not to be proved
be proved at the option of plaintiff
be proved at the option of defendant
- Option 1: be proved
- This is correct. Under Section 90 of the Indian Evidence Act, a document that is 30 years old is presumed to be genuine if produced from proper custody. This helps in proving the possession or ownership of property by ancestors like grandfather.
- Option 2: not to be proved
- This is incorrect. Age-old documents can indeed help prove such facts.
- Option 3: be proved at the option of plaintiff
- This is misleading. The law applies to all parties, not just the plaintiff.
- Option 4: be proved at the option of defendant
- Same as above, it's not just at the defendant's option but depends on who produces the document.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses