send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
It is a well-settled law that the rule of prudence requires that the evidence of an accomplice should ordinarily be corroborated by some other evidence. It was held by Supreme Court in
Francis Stanly v. Intelligence Officer, AIR 2007 SC 794
Youaraj Rai v. Clzander Balzadur Karki, AIR 2007 SC 561
Kamla Devi v. Khushal Kanwar, AIR 2007 SC 663
Bablu v. State of Rajastlzan, AIR 2006 SC 115
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses