Which of the following admission is no evidence ........

Indian Evidence Act (IEA) 1872 Relevancy of Facts

Which of the following admission is no evidence

an admission by one of the several defendants in a suit against another defendant

an admission by a guardian ad litem against a minor

an admission by one of the partners of a firm against the firm or other partners

Only (a) &(b).

- Option 1: An admission by one of the several defendants in a suit against another defendant.

- Such admissions are generally not conclusive against other defendants, as they are not against the interest of the party admitting.

- Option 2: An admission by a guardian ad litem against a minor.

- A guardian ad litem's admission usually doesn't bind a minor since the guardian represents, rather than shares interests.

- Option 3: An admission by one of the partners of a firm against the firm or other partners.

- Typically, this can be evidence against the firm or other partners because of the collective responsibility in partnerships.

- Option 4: Only (a) & (b).

- This states that only the admissions under Options 1 and 2 aren't evidence.

Correct Answer: Option 4 - Only (a) & (b).

“”

Submit Error